Category Archives: Biodiversity

Petition: Protect our native waterbirds – Ban duck shooting!

Please help our native waterbirds by lobbying to put an end to this cruelty and ban recreational duck shooting once and for all.

US ballistics expert and duck shooter, Tom Roster, has shown that at least one in four birds targeted are not killed but wounded (this figure was recognised by Victoria’s Department of Sustainability and Environment)

Shotguns spray hundreds of small pellets, resulting in ducks with fractured or broken legs, or legs shot off entirely, shattered bills, splintered wings, pellets through eyes and gunshot lodged in organs, muscles and tendons. This is grotesque cruelty and wounded birds face a slow, painful death. Rescuers have often seen birds stuffed into shooters’ bags while still alive.

Injured Eurasian Coot - Kerang -17.5 Kim Wormald

(image: This wounded protected Eurasian Coot was recovered by rescuers at Lake Murphy on May 17. It was treated by a wildlife carer and released at a sanctuary last weekend. Photo by Kim Wormald)

The opening weekend attracted 14,000 hunters across the state, with 26,000 people authorised to hunt ducks. The government says a survey of the state’s 47,000 licensed game hunters found the industry was worth almost $440 million a year. It seems that even the tiniest creature has economic value, equated in dollars!

Laurie Levy, the campaign director with the Coalition Against Duck Shooting, has been an outspoken critic of the industry. “We had rescuers out every weekend of the duck shooting season,” he said.

Again this year, as well as protected and threatened species, lots of so called ‘game’ birds were saved from the shooters’ guns or recovered by rescuers, either dead or wounded.

Despite the dry and quiet season, 10 illegally shot threatened Freckled Ducks, Blue-billed Ducks and Musk Ducks were recovered by rescuers, as well as Swans, Hoary-headed Grebes, over 20 Eurasian Coot and other protected species.

Previous Labor governments in WA, NSW and Queensland have banned the barbaric activity, yet the Victorian Labor party still supports this grotesque cruelty.

(featured image: Freckled duck, Victoria. During the season, rescuers recovered over 100 dead or wounded waterbirds, including illegally shot threatened species such as Freckled Ducks, Blue-billed Ducks and Musk Ducks, as well as protected Hoary-headed Grebes, Eurasian Coots and a Swan)


Petition: Protect our native waterbirds – Ban duck shooting!

Letter to: Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews, Minister for Agriculture Jaala Pulford

Share This:

Please proclaim the Great Koala National Park!

Minister for the Environment, Minister for Heritage, and Assistant Minister for Planning The Hon. Mark Raymond SPEAKMAN, SC MP
Minister for Primary Industries, and Minister for Lands and Water The Hon. Niall BLAIR, MLC
Please proclaim the Great Koala National Park!

Dear Minister Speakman and Minister Blair,

In signing this petition I am writing to express my concern over the alarming decline of koalas in NSW and to pledge my support for the Great Koala National Park. I strongly believe that this park is the best chance we have of securing a future for this iconic species in NSW.

Koala numbers have plummeted by a third in just 20 years and habitat loss, due to land clearing and urban development, has already resulted in koalas disappearing from 75% of their former range.

Populations were under serious threat from land clearing, disease, dog attacks and cars.

The Victorian Government is on the verge of establishing a new national park to protect their faunal emblem, the Leadbeater’s possum. Yet here in New South Wales and across Australia, the koala, our national icon is declining rapidly. Please don’t stand by and watch this happen.

Large  protected areas like the Great Koala National Park remain the single most effective tool for conserving biodiversity worldwide.

The proposed 315,000-hectare national park would protect the Bellingen-Nambucca-Macleay and the Coffs Harbour-Guy Fawkes koala meta-populations. It is estimated the area outlined for protection contains 4500 – or 20 per cent – of NSW’s remaining koalas. The proposal would add about 176,000 hectares of state forest to the existing 140,000 hectare local national parks estate.

Please consider that this new reserve would not only protect two nationally significant koala metapopulations containing 20% of NSW’s remaining wild koalas, but also the many threatened species that share their home, such as the Spotted-Tailed Quoll, Hastings River Mouse and Powerful Owl.

The short-term gains of unsustainable forest logging are far outweighed by the economic, social and biodiversity benefits the new park would bring.

I urge you to commit to creating the Great Koala National Park so that future generations can enjoy koalas in the wild, as we do today.


Sign the Petition

Share This:

Please reject burning and subsidising of native forest wood as renewable energy

picture2

Burning native forest wood for energy is not clean, renewable or green. Australian Government policy is currently not to allow renewable energy subsidies for native forest wood, but this is under threat. Further, logging native forest makes it MORE fire prone. It does NOT reduce risk.

picture8(image: torched and charred wildlife)

The woodchipping industry views burning native forest for electricity as a lifeline to enable continued destruction of Australia’s native forests as traditional markets for woodchips have collapsed. Protecting native forests is the quickest, safest and cheapest way to help stop climate change.

Letter to
Minister for Industry and Science The Hon Ian Macfarlane MP
Minister for the Environment Greg Hunt MP
Shadow Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water The Hon Mark Butler
Senator Dio Wang
Senator Jacquie Lambie
Senator Glenn Lazarus
Senator John Madigan
Senator David Leyonhjelm
Senator Ricky Muir
Senator Nick Xxenophon

Harriett Swift Bega, Australia

Sign the Petition:Please reject burning and subsidising of native forest wood as renewable energy

Share This:

Possible Federal Government EPBC de-listing of endangered species – Southern Brown Bandicoot.

In 2014, a Mammal Action Plan (MAP) was set up by the Federal Government Environment Department under authority of Minister Greg Hunt.
Among many recommendations put forward by the MAP, five early recommendations included Isoodon obesulus obesulus (Southern Brown Bandicoot (South-East)) which has been tentatively recommended to be de-listed from EPBC protection.

The reason given was that there have been too many referrals.
This does not mean SBB are in surplus, it simply reflects the obvious increasing number of applications for approval of residential/commercial development and infrastructure in locations where there are listed species and environmental constraints.

If SBB is de-listed from EPBC protection , current conservation management strategies will no longer be in place and future survival of SBB could be at risk where habitat loss occurs.

The process of listing or de-listing recommended species has several stages, one of which is to receive public comment via submissions. This opportunity will close on Friday 30th January 2015.

Due to absence of information about the MAP proposal to de-list SBB, there is little time.

Please act by lodging a submission requesting that SBB remain listed under the protection of EPBC legislation.

Gloria O’Connor

Environment South East Alliance
26th January 2015
Addendum:  SBB are now extinct at Mornington Peninsula and Frankston.

SBB were in Oakleigh in 1980’s, quarries, market gardens but eventually became extinct.
SBB also went extinct in City of Kingston (Braeside Reserve, Rowan Woodlands, The Grange) in 1990’s.

This proposal is simply based on greed for housing profits, and a blatant elimination of a natural constraint to more housing developments on crucial SBB habitat!  This vandalism of the EPBC Act, by an Environment Minister, is unacceptable!

Forward comment to:
Email: species.consultation@environment.gov.au
Mail to: Marine and Freshwater Species Conservation Section Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division Department of the Environment, PO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601
View consultation documentation available on Dept. of Environment website or by circulated information through community group networks.

Southern_Brown_Bandicoot_juvenile(image: juvenile Southern Brown Bandicoot)

Update: Submissions can be accepted up to the 27th February.

Share This:

Possums cruelly ridiculed by Channel 10’s shallow reporting

Letter from Adrianna Simmons, Wildlife carer invited onto the program, The Project. 13 July, 2015

To writers Gerard McCulloch and Aleisha McCormack
Network Ten

Dear The Project Producers,
When I was approached last Thursday 9 th of July to take part in an interview to talk about the consumption of possums for your program “The Project” I honestly thought that I was going to be part of a balanced and fair segment in which both sides of the story were going to be explored equally.

I had a reporter and a camera man from your program visiting my wildlife shelter for a couple of hours and I felt very happy with the interview we had.

I expressed my opinions about this matter from 3 different points of view, according with my knowledge and my experience:

1. As a biologist specialized in Zoology, I tried to explain the conservation, sustainability and ecological long term implications of catching possums directly from the wild, killing them and offering them as a food source to an increasing human population. This is particularly dangerous when the possums come from an island, where ecosystems are exceptionally vulnerable and sensitive.

I also talked about the many difficulties that our wildlife is already facing due to human interference, as well as the structure of brushtail possum’s populations, the cause of imbalance in wildlife species and ways in which this situation could be addressed.
Adrianna
2. As a Wildlife Shelter Operator for 15 years, I shared my experience about caring and rehabilitating orphaned, injured, sick and displaced native animals, so the members of the public could have a better understanding of our wildlife, possums in particular, from a point of view that most people don’t have access to. I thought this was a wonderful opportunity for our community to learn about many amazing and interesting characteristics that possums have.

Many of us would be opposed to eating cats or dogs, because we are connected with them in many ways; for obvious reasons most people don’t have the chance to interact with possums like wildlife carers do, so I thought that this interview could offer that rare opportunity to share such a valuable new perspective about them.

3. As an environmental educator, I expressed the need to educate our community about the uniqueness and beauty of our native animals, and also about their fragility, their importance and their current condition. We all need to understand, appreciate, respect, take responsibility and connect with the unique creatures that share this land with us.
Education about our wildlife and the environment that sustains us all is a key factor for the long term survival of all forms of life, including ours.

I had seen The Project before and I thought that you were an impartial, objective and fair program, in which both sides of any story were presented. I had such respect for your program and because of that, I was very happy to take part in this segment.

However, I was horrified, disappointed and deeply saddened when I saw that your program was a true ad for possum pies. I honestly didn’t know that you were advocates for wildlife consumption and business promoters.

Many of us are wondering if the restaurant paid you for this ad, or the pies you ate at the end were enough payment to promote it.

All the information you presented was turned against the possums in a very irresponsible and uninformed way. Journalists have a great responsibility because they can educate our community and shape ways of living, ways of thinking and ways of acting, and I don’t think you yet realise the implications for the possums and the wildlife in general of your program last Friday.

– You said that “possums are in plague proportions that threatens farm land and other native species”. This comment is not only extremely ignorant but dangerous. Wildlife interactions are more complex than that and, and the threats usually go the other way around: humans to wildlife and not wildlife to humans.

What is very shallow from your report, is never asking yourselves why populations of wildlife are unbalanced, and what is worse, implying that the solution to this “problem” is killing the possums.

You need to be honest and admit that the real reason of this killing at the moment is not for environmental reasons but to make profit for a business.

– Then you have the audacity to mention that this is a “humane and environmental way to produce meat.”
Have you ever seen a wild animal trapped? Have you ever seen how they are killed? Do you know how the babies in pouches are killed? Do you think that is humane? Possums are very intelligent creatures with the capacity to feel fear, pain and distress, just like you and me.- What about “environmental way to produce meat?” Do you think that catching animals from a wild population to feed the increasing population of
humans is sustainable in the long term?

Possum workshop 1

Australia has the highest rate of mammal extinction on the planet. All extinct or endangered animals in Australia were common not long ago, but many of them were labelled as a “plague” and look at the result. Do you realise the dangers of your comments?
We are such slow learners…

– You also mentioned that eating wildlife was a way of life for 40 thousand years. This is very true, but the difference is that aborigines had a deep
knowledge and respect for nature and they followed truly environmental and strict ways to hunt, and at that time they did it for their survival and not for
profit as the restaurant you are promoting is doing it today.

You cannot compare the way of life of aborigines and ours regarding the relationship with nature, I think this is insulting for them.

You took all the time to show one side of the story and from the entire interview you did with me, you aired only two sentences out of context.

The voice of the possums, the voice of the wildlife, the voice of the environment, the voice of all wildlife carers that volunteer their lives to help wildlife in need, were silent in your report.

I believe that true journalism needs to be fair. With your report you are influencing the community in one way and you are not giving people the opportunity to see the whole picture and make an informed decision or have an informed opinion about this critical issue. I honestly believe that you have done so much damage and you don’t even realise it yet.

I would like to ask you to be professional enough to air the entire interview you did with me, and also contact the wildlife organisations we have in Victoria and ask their opinions, their experiences and their points of view about this issue.

This is not a matter of opinions or ideas; for many creatures, this is a matter of life and death, this is a matter of conservation and education, and this is a matter of damaging or protecting the very complex web of life which we are all a part of.
I ask you to please consider this proposal and have this “news delivered differently.”
Sincerely,
Adriana Simmonds
Human Seeds Director
Biologist
Wildlife Shelter Operator

humanseeds logo v2

Adriana Simmonds is a Colombian Biologist who fell in love with Australia and its amazing creatures. She has always been an environmental educator trying to share my passion for animals and the environment with people of all ages and backgrounds.

During the past 11 years she’s been running a wildlife shelter, where she has had the privilege of taking care of countless orphaned, injured, sick and displaced native animals.

27 Toppings road, Wonga Park VIC 3115
0416056897 – (03)97222908
adriana.simmonds@humanseeds.com.au

Human Seeds
www.humanseeds.com.au

Share This:

Regional friends of wildlife release April 2015

HABITAT LOSS, SHOOTING, CARS, DOGS, FENCES ARE THE REAL STORY BEHIND CANBERRA KANGAROO NUMBERS AS NEW ‘CULL’ SET

Kangaroos in the ACT persist in anything approaching natural densities in only 15 percent of their former habitat, according to a 2014 report. This exposes as false, government claims to the public that kangaroos are ‘overabundant’ and in numbers that top the nation and therefore it’s OK to kill them.

Regional Friends of Wildlife says the report shows much of what is told the public and the media about kangaroos in the territory is false and propaganda, to justify an unethical and unnecessary government experiment in removing most remaining kangaroos from the city landscape.

The 2015 cull is set to begin on 1 May with another one approved for 2106.

“Already, and particularly when they are finished with this next two rounds of culling, most Canberrans and their overseas visitors will no longer see a kangaroo anywhere near the city, except in Queanbeyan and out in the national parks,” said Regional Friends member and President of the Animal Justice Party Steve Garlick.

“This is a huge loss to the citizenry and to tourism but also a tragic injustice to a kangaroo species that is willing and able to co-exist with us and provides ecosystem services such as native grass seed dispersal and lowering bushfire danger through grazing,” said Professor Garlick noting that the reserve managers now bring in cows to do that task.

The 2014 report by field ecologist Ray Mjadwesch was prepared for the ACT Administrative Appeals Tribunal (ACAT) case disputing the 2014 licenses to kill kangaroos.

It shows that compared to the Eastern Grey’s former range, including leasehold farmland:

Eastern Grey Kangaroos are extinct from 26.6% of the ACT, due to land use changes (city and urban areas, and heavily modified rural landscapes.

Kangaroos are under pressure across 29.9% of the ACT, due to agricultural activities including loss of habitat (pine plantations), culling on private rural leases and shooting in reserves.

Kangaroos persist in anything like ‘natural’ densities in intact habitat in only 15.2% of the ACT.

28.3% of the ACT is unsuitable habitat for EGK due to steep terrain, incorrect vegetation types, etc.

“This work suggests that Eastern Grey Kangaroos may have experienced an overall decline across at least 56.5% of the ACT, including total extinction from over a quarter of their former range,“ said Garlick.

“The temporary higher densities people may have seen in some reserves like Goorooyaroo are very much related to housing estates popping up next door on their former range in Gungahlin.”

Regular shooting by nearby leaseholders may also have driven more animals to the seeming sanctuary of urban reserves.

Contact Prof Steve Garlick 0428 88 05 64; 6238 1533

Share This:

1 3 4 5 6 7